Sub-Contracting - managing the commercial realities 分包承建制度：大判與二判的利益衝突
Authors
Citation
建築承造雜誌, Mar/Apr, 1991, pp. 104-111
Abstract
The traditional contractual arrangement places great importance on contracts between client and main contractor, with architects, quantity surveyors and other professional advisers participating directly in the contract as agents of the client.
Specialist firms are not parties to the contract and indeed, are somewhat remote from it. Often, these specialists operate as sub-contractors and are generally only in contract with the main contractor.
In this first of two parts, Construction Commercial Services Ltd managing director Michael Salmon examines the significant features of this arrangement, in particular the undue degree of contractual remoteness of the specialists from the client.
傳統的建築合約安排，極着重客戶(發展商)與總承建商之間的合約。建築師、測量師及其他專業顧問，是以客戶的代理人身份直接參與合約。
但一些專門工程公司，並非合約的一部份，而事實上，它們可說與發展商並無合約關係。這些公司只作為分包承建商，一般只是與總承建商有合約。
Construction Commercial Services Ltd 的董事總經理沈文高，在本文中深入分析了此種安排的特色。由於篇幅所限，本文的下半部份將在下期刊出。
(1) Contractual relationships
合約關係
(2) Countering abuses
防止濫用合約安排
(3) Standard sub-contract forms
標準的分包承建合約
(4) Non-standard forms
非標準合約
(5) Pay-when-paid
收款後付款
(6) Specious and irrelevant
(7) Set-off
債務抵消
(8) Other contractual abuses
其他濫用合約行為
Description
Type
Article
Format
Date
1991
Language
en,zh